Is Capitalism All it is Cracked Up to Be: Socialist Success and Imperial Interference Part 3 of 3 – Chile

Introduction

‘Socialism always fails.’ We’ve heard the line before. In this final part, we keep asking the same question we set at the start – ‘Does socialism fail by design, or is it undermined by imperialism?’ Now we turn to the most iconic case of all: Chile under Salvador Allende (1970–1973), the world’s first democratically elected Marxist president.

Like our previous investigations, we’ll present a narrative-driven account discussing the early wins, the decline, and the geopolitical issues. In Chile, the rise in socialism unfolded through the ballot box, and reforms were pushed within constitutional rules. Yet the story ends with tanks in the capital, a bombed presidential palace, and a dictatorship that rewired the economy.

As before, we dive into declassified CIA records alongside economic and social data. We’ll ask readers to weigh the same dilemma: were Chile’s troubles because of the model, or did outside pressure, economic warfare, and corporate lobbying make success impossible?

So, let’s get stuck in…

Chile Before Allende

In the decades leading up to Allende’s presidency, Chile stood out in Latin America as one of the region’s most stable democracies. Since the 1930s, power had alternated between centrist, conservative, and left-wing parties through democracy. But beneath this, Chile faced many of the same challenges as its neighbours, such as high inequality, landholding elites, and foreign dominance over industry.

During the 1960s, politics split. The Christian Democrats launched a reform program they called the “Revolution in Liberty.” The government pursued moderate agricultural reform, increased education spending, and encouraged “Chileanisation” of copper, partly buying into foreign-owned mines. These measures improved access to land and schools, but they fell short of the expectations of the poor and alienated landowners who felt their privileges were eroding.

Salvador Allende, a physician and socialist senator, had already run for the presidency three times before 1970. He campaigned for a “Chilean road to socialism,” arguing that only deeper reforms, full nationalisation of copper, broader land redistribution, and expanded welfare could tackle Chile’s inequalities. When Allende won the presidency with 36.6% of the vote, backed by his Popular Unity coalition, he promised to push the transformation further than any of his predecessors had dared.

Allende’s Socialist Policies (1970–1973)

Allende took office in 1970, and a “Chilean road to socialism” was promised. A gradual, democratic transformation of society through constitutional means.

Allende nationalised copper mines (Chile’s largest export), many of which were owned by American corporations like Anaconda and Kennecott. Banks and industries were also brought under state control. This was popular in Chile. Copper was seen as “the wages of Chile”, and reclaiming it gave the state new revenue for social spending. But, of course, US firms lost billions in assets. This escalated tensions with Washington, which led to hostility and corporate lobbying against Allende.

The Allende government also accelerated the land redistribution reform, expropriating estates larger than 80 hectares. From this, thousands of peasant families gained access to farmland. Elite landowners resisted fiercely.

Allende initiated many Welfare expansions. A massive social agenda expanded free school meals, housing programs, healthcare services, and access to education. One famous initiative guaranteed a daily half litre of milk for every child. These programs placed heavy pressure on the national budget, even though the nutrition, health, and literacy indicators improved, particularly for poor and working-class families.

In 1973, inflation ran rampant, exceeding 200%. This was because the wages were raised significantly, while the prices of basic goods were frozen to protect living standards. In the short term, real wages rose by about 30% in 1971, unemployment fell, and consumption surged. However, by 1972, shortages and inflation set in. Producers, squeezed by fixed prices, cut back output.

US and Corporate Reaction

Declassified records show that just days after the 1970 election, President Richard Nixon instructed the CIA to “make the economy scream” in Chile to undermine Allende’s presidency. The directive, known internally as Project FUBELT, authorised covert action to destabilise Chile both politically and economically. The US government applied financial leverage to weaken Allende’s reforms. International loans were cut off, foreign aid stopped, and Chile was blocked from credit. These moves deepened Chile’s crisis and exacerbated shortages.

American copper companies Anaconda and Kennecott, whose mines had been nationalised without what they considered fair compensation, lobbied aggressively in Washington for intervention. Like the United Fruit Company in Guatemala, these corporations framed Allende’s policies as communist.

The CIA channelled millions of dollars into Chile to weaken Allende’s Popular Unity coalition. Funds went to opposition parties, business groups, and influential, anti-government newspapers. Although the CIA was not directly responsible for the (predictable upcoming) coup itself, documents confirm it fostered close ties with Chilean officers in the years leading up to 1973. Plans for “contingency” action were discussed, to ensure that if the military moved against Allende, it would have implicit US support.

The evidence can paint a clear picture of another case of imperial intervention. Allende’s policies did generate economic strain, but were they unfolded under the weight of economic warfare, covert propaganda, and corporate lobbying designed to destabilise his government? As in Guatemala, the line between Cold War geopolitics and corporate interest blurred.

The Coup of September 11th, 1973

On the morning of September 11th, 1973, the Chilean military moved against Allende. Tanks rolled into Santiago, and the presidential palace was bombed by the air force. Radio stations loyal to the government were silenced, and opposition broadcasts declared the end of Allende’s rule.

Inside the palace, Allende delivered a final radio address, promising not to resign and urging Chileans to defend their democracy. Hours later, when troops stormed the building, Allende was found dead. The official account described his death as suicide, though speculation about the exact circumstances continues to this day.

By evening, the military had seized full control of the country. General Augusto Pinochet, who had been appointed army commander only weeks earlier, emerged as the leader.

The coup marked a violent end to Chile’s experiment with socialism. Supporters of the Popular Unity coalition were rounded up en masse, and stadiums were turned into prisons.

Aftermath

The overthrow of Allende ushered in nearly two decades of military dictatorship under General Pinochet. In the immediate aftermath, repression was swift and brutal. Tens of thousands were arrested in makeshift camps. Thousands were tortured, executed, or disappeared, creating a legacy of fear that scarred Chilean society for generations.

Allende’s socialist program was dismantled. Nationalised industries were reprivatised, land reform was rolled back, and welfare programs were cut. The military aligned closely with US economic advisers, particularly the Chicago Boys, Chilean economists trained at the University of Chicago under Milton Friedman, who designed a free market program.

Pinochet’s government loosened trade, privatised state industries, reduced social spending, and weakened labour protections. While inflation stabilised and foreign investment returned, inequality deepened, and unemployment surged. Chile became a testing ground for neoliberal policies that would later spread worldwide.

Despite global concerns of human rights violations, the Pinochet regime kept support from the United States, which saw the dictatorship as an ally against communism. Declassified CIA documents confirm Washington was aware of the extent of repression.

Reflection

Chile’s experiment with socialism was unlike Burkina Faso’s or Guatemala’s. It was pursued through democratic election, not coups, and unfolded within the framework of one of Latin America’s strongest democracies. Allende’s reforms, nationalising copper, redistributing land, and expanding welfare, delivered actual benefits to the poor and working classes. Yet they also created economic strains and fierce opposition from Chile’s elite. More critically, they collided head-on with the USA corporate interests and Cold War strategy.

Looking back across this series, the pattern is striking.

  • In Burkina Faso, Sankara’s push for self-reliance and equality was cut short by assassination.
  • In Guatemala, Árbenz’s democratic reforms were overturned in a CIA-backed coup.
  • And in Chile, Allende’s democratic socialism ended under US covert.

Together, they force us to revisit the question we began with: does socialism fail because of its own flaws, or because it is not allowed to succeed when it threatens global interests?

The answer remains ambiguous. But the history of Burkina Faso, Guatemala, and Chile shows that whenever socialism delivered real progress, it also attracted powerful enemies.

References

Author

Trending now

The Biggest LBO in History – EA Goes Private
Continuation Funds: Innovation or Illusion?
The Great Unwind? The Future of the Japan–U.S. Carry Trade
Is Capitalism All it is Cracked Up to Be?: Socialist Success and Imperial Interference Part 1 of 3 – Burkina Faso